Good practice or positive action? Using Q methodology to identify competing views on improving gender equality in academic medicine

Bryant, LD orcid.org/0000-0002-1972-7395, Burkinshaw, P, House, AO orcid.org/0000-0001-8721-8026 et al. (2 more authors) (2017) Good practice or positive action? Using Q methodology to identify competing views on improving gender equality in academic medicine. BMJ Open, 7 (8). e015973. ISSN 2044-6055

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: (c) 2017, Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article). All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Dates:
  • Published: August 2017
  • Accepted: 2 June 2017
  • Published (online): 22 August 2017
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Business (Leeds) > Management Division (LUBS) (Leeds) > Management Division Organizational Behaviour (LUBS)
The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Leeds Institute of Health Sciences (Leeds) > Academic Unit of Primary Care (Leeds)
The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Leeds Institute of Health Sciences (Leeds) > Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences (Leeds)
Depositing User: Symplectic Publications
Date Deposited: 19 Sep 2017 10:36
Last Modified: 05 Oct 2017 16:24
Status: Published
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015973
Related URLs:

Share / Export

Statistics