Deidda, D orcid.org/0000-0002-2766-4339, Efthimiou, N, Manber, R et al. (4 more authors) (2017) Comparative evaluation of image reconstruction methods for the siemens PET-MR scanner using the stir library. In: 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD). 2016 IEEE NSS/MIC/RTSD, 29 Oct - 06 Nov 2016, Strasbourg, France. IEEE ISBN 9781509016426
Abstract
With the introduction of Positron Emission Tomography - Magnetic Resonance (PET-MR) scanners the development of new algorithms and the comparison of the performance of different iterative reconstruction algorithms and the characteristics of the reconstructed images data is relevant. In this work, we perform a quantitative assessment of the currently used ordered subset (OS) algorithms for low-counts PET-MR data taken from a Siemens Biograph mMR scanner using the Software for Tomographic Image Reconstruction (STIR, stir.sf.net). A comparison has been performed in terms of bias and coefficient of variation (CoV). Within the STIR library different algorithms are available, such as Order Subsets Expectation Maximization (OSEM), OS Maximum A Posteriori One Step Late (OSMAPOSL) with Quadratic Prior (QP) and with Median Root Prior (MRP), OS Separable Paraboloidal Surrogate (OSSPS) with QP and Filtered Back-Projection (FBP). In addition, List Mode (LM) reconstruction is available. Corrections for attenuation, scatter and random events are performed using STIR instead of using the scanner. Data from the Hoffman brain phantom are acquired, processed and reconstructed. Clinical data from the thorax of a patient have also been reconstructed with the same algorithms. The number of subsets does not appreciably affect the bias nor the coefficient of variation (CoV=11%) at a fixed sub-iteration number. The percentage relative bias and CoV maximum values for OSMAPOSL-MRP are 10% and 15% at 360 s acquisition and 12% and 15% for the 36 s, whilst for OSMAPOSL-QP they are 6% and 16% for 360 s acquisition and 11% and 23% at 36 s and for OSEM 6% and 11% for the 360 s acquisition and 10% and 15% for the 36 s. Our findings demonstrate that when it comes to low-counts, noise and bias become significant. The methodology for reconstructing Siemens mMR data with STIR is included in the CCP-PET-MR website.
Metadata
Item Type: | Proceedings Paper |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © IEEE 2017. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. |
Keywords: | Image reconstruction; Positron emission tomography; Iterative methods; Reconstruction algorithms; Attenuation; Phantoms |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Leeds |
Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Engineering & Physical Sciences (Leeds) > School of Mathematics (Leeds) > Statistics (Leeds) The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
Date Deposited: | 21 Feb 2017 11:20 |
Last Modified: | 20 Mar 2018 15:57 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | IEEE |
Identification Number: | 10.1109/NSSMIC.2016.8069615 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:112581 |