Desperately Seeking Dissonance: Identifying the Disconfirming Case in Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

This is the latest version of this eprint.

Booth, A. orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-3880, Carroll, C., Ilott, I. et al. (2 more authors) (2013) Desperately Seeking Dissonance: Identifying the Disconfirming Case in Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 23 (1). pp. 126-141. ISSN 1049-7323

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © 2013 by SAGE Publications. This is an author produced version of a paper subsequently published in Qualitative Health Research. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.
Keywords: meta-ethnography; metasynthesis; research, qualitative; systematic reviews; triangulation
Dates:
  • Published: January 2013
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research
Depositing User: Symplectic Sheffield
Date Deposited: 09 May 2016 09:16
Last Modified: 27 Mar 2018 00:31
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732312466295
Status: Published
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312466295
Related URLs:

Available Versions of this Item

  • Desperately Seeking Dissonance: Identifying the Disconfirming Case in Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. (deposited 09 May 2016 09:16) [Currently Displayed]

Share / Export

Statistics