Evaluating public involvement in research design and grant development: Using a qualitative document analysis method to analyse an award scheme for researchers

Baxter, S.K. orcid.org/0000-0002-6034-5495, Muir, D., Brereton, M.L. et al. (6 more authors) (2016) Evaluating public involvement in research design and grant development: Using a qualitative document analysis method to analyse an award scheme for researchers. Research Involvement and Engagement, 2 (13). ISSN 2056-7529

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © 2016 Baxter et al. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/ publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Keywords: Patient and public involvement; Public involvement; Lay representation; Consumer involvement; Qualitative Document analysis; Research design; Patient and public engagement; Participatory research
Dates:
  • Published: 1 April 2016
  • Published (online): 1 April 2016
  • Accepted: 23 March 2016
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research
Depositing User: Symplectic Sheffield
Date Deposited: 14 Apr 2016 09:41
Last Modified: 14 Apr 2016 09:41
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-016-0027-x
Status: Published
Publisher: BioMed Central
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-016-0027-x
Related URLs:

Share / Export

Statistics