Should reference alternatives in pivot design SC surveys be treated differently?

Warning

There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.

Hess, S. and Rose, J.M. (2009) Should reference alternatives in pivot design SC surveys be treated differently? Environmental and Resource Economics, 42 (3). pp. 297-317. ISSN 0924-6460

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
  • Hess, S.
  • Rose, J.M.
Dates:
  • Published: March 2009
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > Institute for Transport Studies (Leeds)
Depositing User: Sherpa Assistant
Date Deposited: 01 Oct 2010 15:17
Last Modified: 01 Oct 2010 15:17
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9244-6
Status: Published
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9244-6

Available Versions of this Item

Share / Export

Statistics