Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems

Loftus, A., Murphy, S., McKenna, I. et al. (1 more author) (2004) Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems. Experimental Brain Research, 158 (3). pp. 328-335. ISSN 0014-4819

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
  • Loftus, A.
  • Murphy, S.
  • McKenna, I.
  • Mon-Williams, M.
Keywords: prehension; field of view; distance; calibration; feedback; perception; variability
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Psychology (Leeds) > Cognitive Psychology (Leeds)
Depositing User: Repository Officer
Date Deposited: 26 Jun 2009 14:28
Last Modified: 18 Jun 2015 17:29
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1900-7
Status: Published
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1900-7

Share / Export

Statistics