Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems

Loftus, A., Murphy, S., McKenna, I. and Mon-Williams, M. (2004) Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems. Experimental Brain Research, 158 (3). pp. 328-335. ISSN 0014-4819

Abstract

Metadata

Keywords: prehension; field of view; distance; calibration; feedback; perception; variability
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Psychology (Leeds) > Cognitive Psychology (Leeds)
Depositing User: Repository Officer
Date Deposited: 26 Jun 2009 14:28
Last Modified: 18 Jun 2015 17:29
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1900-7
Status: Published
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Identification Number: 10.1007/s00221-004-1900-7

Share / Export

Statistics