Are REDD projects pro-poor in their spatial targeting? Evidence from Kenya

Atela, JO, Quinn, CH and Minang, PA (2014) Are REDD projects pro-poor in their spatial targeting? Evidence from Kenya. Applied Geography, 52. 14 - 24. ISSN 0143-6228

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
  • Atela, JO
  • Quinn, CH
  • Minang, PA
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: (c) 2014, Elsevier. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Applied Geography. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Atela, JO, Quinn, CH and Minang, PA (2014) Are REDD projects pro-poor in their spatial targeting? Evidence from Kenya. Applied Geography, 52, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.04.009
Keywords: Forest resources; Pro-poor; REDD projects; Spatial targeting; Socioeconomic
Dates:
  • Published: August 2014
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > School of Earth and Environment (Leeds)
Depositing User: Symplectic Publications
Date Deposited: 28 Jul 2014 11:06
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2016 16:19
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.04.009
Status: Published
Publisher: Elsevier
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.04.009

Share / Export

Statistics