Consistency between direct trial evidence and Bayesian Mixed Treatment Comparison: Is head-to-head evidence always more reliable?

Madan, J., Cooper, K.L., Stevenson, M.D. et al. (2 more authors) (2009) Consistency between direct trial evidence and Bayesian Mixed Treatment Comparison: Is head-to-head evidence always more reliable? Discussion Paper. HEDS Discussion Paper 09/08 .

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
  • Madan, J. (jason.madan@bristol.ac.uk)
  • Cooper, K.L. (k.l.cooper@sheffield.ac.uk)
  • Stevenson, M.D. (m.d.stevenson@sheffield.ac.uk)
  • Whyte, S. (sophie.whyte@sheffield.ac.uk)
  • Akehurst, R. (r.l.akehurst@sheffield.ac.uk)
Keywords: Bayesian methods, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, G-CSFs, febrile neutropenia, mixed treatment comparison, methodology
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > Health Economics and Decision Science > HEDS Discussion Paper Series
Depositing User: ScHARR / HEDS (Sheffield)
Date Deposited: 31 Oct 2012 09:46
Last Modified: 09 Jun 2014 08:42
Status: Published

Download

Filename: 09.08.pdf

Share / Export