White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

The development of a new measure of quality of life in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: the Reflux questionnaire

Macran, S., Wileman, S., Barton, G. and Russell, I. (2007) The development of a new measure of quality of life in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: the Reflux questionnaire. Quality of Life Research, 16 (2). pp. 331-343. ISSN 0962-9343

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This paper reports on the development of a new measure of health-related quality of life for use among patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), funded as part of the REFLUX trial. This is a large UK multi centre trial that aims to compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of minimal access surgery with best medical treatment for patients with GORD within the NHS. Method Potential items were identified via a series of interviews and focus groups carried out with patients who were receiving/had received medical or surgical treatment for GORD. The final measure consisted of 31 items covering 7 categories (Heartburn; Acid reflux; Wind; Eating and swallowing; Bowel movements; Sleep; Work, physical and social activities). The measure produced two outputs: a quality of life score (RQLS) and five Reflux symptom scores. Reliability (internal consistency), criterion validity with the SF-36 and, sensitivity to change in terms of relationship with reported change in prescribed medication were assessed amongst a sample of 794 patients recruited into the trial.

RESULTS

The measure was shown to be internally consistent, to show criterion validity with the SF-36 and sensitive to changes in patients use of prescribed medication at baseline and 3 month follow-up.

DISCUSSION

The Reflux questionnaire is a new self-administered questionnaire for use amongst patients with GORD. Initial findings suggest that the new measure is valid, reliable, acceptable to respondents and simple to administer in both a clinical and research context.

Item Type: Article
Institution: The University of York
Academic Units: The University of York > Centre for Health Economics (York)
Depositing User: York RAE Import
Date Deposited: 13 Feb 2009 09:44
Last Modified: 13 Feb 2009 09:44
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9005-3
Status: Published
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Identification Number: 10.1007/s11136-006-9005-3
URI: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/7451

Actions (repository staff only: login required)