Edyvane, D. (2003) Against unconditional love. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 20 (1). pp. 59-75. ISSN 0264-3758Full text not available from this repository.
While unconditional love is frequently regarded as the best kind of romantic commitment, our commitments in general are not thought to be unconditional. In other contexts, we think conditional commitment (commitment which can in some sense be rendered intelligible by appeal to reasons) to be superior. This paper examines the peculiar status of unconditional love in the romantic context and argues that it is unwarranted; the best kind of romantic commitment should be viewed as conditional. The first part of the paper examines and criticises those arguments which attempt to defend conditional love by appeal to the idea that love is based upon the properties of the beloved. The second part of the paper examines Harry Frankfurt's narrowly subjective conception of unconditional love and highlights certain counterintuitive consequences of it. The final section of the paper argues that the best kind of love will prompt us to adopt two perspectives with regard to the beloved. While loving does involve the narrowly subjective perspective defended by Frankfurt, it also demands that we strive for a more objective perspective, which takes into consideration the reasons we might be able to offer to render our commitment intelligible to others.
|Institution:||The University of York|
|Academic Units:||The University of York > Philosophy (York)
The University of Leeds > Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Law (Leeds) > School of Politics & International Studies (POLIS) (Leeds)
|Depositing User:||York RAE Import|
|Date Deposited:||14 May 2009 14:23|
|Last Modified:||18 Jun 2015 17:27|
|Publisher:||Blackwell Publishing Ltd|