White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

Nurse practitioner and practice nurses' use of research information in clinical decision making: findings from an exploratory study

McCaughan, D., Thompson, C., Cullum, N., Sheldon, T. and Raynor, P. (2005) Nurse practitioner and practice nurses' use of research information in clinical decision making: findings from an exploratory study. Family Practice, 22 (5). pp. 490-497. ISSN 0263-2136

Full text not available from this repository.



There is a lack of evidence regarding the kinds of decisions made by primary care nurses and the information sources they use in clinical decision making.


To describe the decisions made by nurses working in general practice and the sources of information they use to underpin those decisions.


Qualitative methods (interviews, observation, documentary analysis) were used to collect data on the clinical decision making and information seeking behaviour of a purposive sample of 29 practice nurses and four nurse practitioners from general practices in the North of England. Data were collected November 2001–September 2002.


A seven-fold typology captured the types of decisions the nurses made on a daily basis concerning assessment, diagnosis, intervention, referral, communication, service delivery and organization (SDO) and information seeking. Faced with clinical uncertainty, the majority of the nurses in the study relied on personal experience, or obtained advice and information from GP or other colleagues. These ‘human sources’ of information were overwhelmingly preferred to text or on-line resources. Despite encounters with evidence-based resources through continuing professional development, the nurses rarely used them to seek answers to routine clinical questions.


The decisions of the nurses in the study were mainly concerned with undifferentiated diagnosis and treatment, in the context of acute conditions and chronic disease management. ‘Human sources’ of information were preferred to any other; however, we do not know whether information obtained from colleagues is based on research.

Item Type: Article
Institution: The University of York
Academic Units: The University of York > Health Sciences (York)
Depositing User: York RAE Import
Date Deposited: 24 Jul 2009 14:19
Last Modified: 24 Jul 2009 14:19
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmi042
Status: Published
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Identification Number: 10.1093/fampra/cmi042
URI: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/6144

Actions (repository staff only: login required)