PINTZUK, S. (2005) Arguments against a universal base: evidence from Old English. English Language and Linguistics, 9 (1). pp. 115-138. ISSN 1360-6743Full text not available from this repository.
This article presents arguments against a uniform head-initial analysis of Old English clause structure. Three analyses that have been proposed for Old English – variation in the headedness of underlying structure, uniform head-initial structure with object movement, and uniform head-initial structure with pied piping – are presented and evaluated in terms of the Old English data that they are able to account for. In particular, it is argued that the positions of verbs and their complements in constructions with quantified and nonquantified objects, pronominal objects, particles, and double objects cannot be derived without stipulations within uniform head-initial accounts, but can be derived unproblematically within a framework that incorporates a headedness parameter, requiring only a stipulation to block V–O–Aux order.
|Institution:||The University of York|
|Academic Units:||The University of York > Language and Linguistic Science (York)|
|Depositing User:||York RAE Import|
|Date Deposited:||19 Jun 2009 11:12|
|Last Modified:||19 Jun 2009 11:12|
|Publisher:||Cambridge University Press|