White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

Preventive strategies for group B streptococcal and other bacterial infections in early infancy: cost effectiveness and value of information analyses

Colbourn, T.E., Asseburg, C., Bojke, L., Philips, Z., Welton, N.J., Claxton, K., Ades, A.E. and Gilbert, R.E. (2007) Preventive strategies for group B streptococcal and other bacterial infections in early infancy: cost effectiveness and value of information analyses. BMJ, 335 (7621). 655-658A. ISSN 0959-8146

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the cost effectiveness of strategies for preventing neonatal infection with group B streptococci and other bacteria in the UK and the value of further information from research.

Design: Use of a decision model to compare the cost effectiveness of prenatal testing for group B streptococcal infection (by polymerase chain reaction or culture), prepartum antibiotic treatment (intravenous penicillin or oral erythromycin), and vaccination during pregnancy (not yet available) for serious bacterial infection in early infancy across 12 maternal risk groups. Model parameters were estimated using multi-parameter evidence synthesis to incorporate all relevant data inputs.

Data sources: 32 systematic reviews were conducted: 14 integrated results from published studies, 24 involved analyses of primary datasets, and five included expert opinion.

Main outcomes measures: Healthcare costs per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

Results: Current best practice (to treat only high risk women without prior testing for infection) and universal testing by culture or polymerase chain reaction were not cost effective options. Immediate extension of current best practice to treat all women with preterm and high risk term deliveries without testing (11% treated) would result in substantial net benefits. Currently, addition of culture testing for low risk term women, while treating all preterm and high risk term women, would be the most cost effective option (21% treated). If available in the future, vaccination combined with treating all preterm and high risk term women and no testing for low risk women would probably be marginally more cost effective and would limit antibiotic exposure to 11% of women. The value of information is highest (67m) pound if vaccination is included as an option.

Conclusions: Extension of current best practice to treat all women with preterm and high risk term deliveries is readily achievable and would be beneficial. The choice between adding culture testing for tow risk women or vaccination for all should be informed by further research. Trials to evaluate vaccine efficacy should be prioritised.

Item Type: Article
Institution: The University of York
Academic Units: The University of York > Centre for Health Economics (York)
Depositing User: Repository Officer
Date Deposited: 12 Nov 2008 10:21
Last Modified: 12 Nov 2008 10:21
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39325.681806.AD
Status: Published
Publisher: BMJ Publishing
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: 10.1136/bmj.39325.681806.AD
URI: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/4834

Actions (repository staff only: login required)