Comment on: Contrasting Deep-water Records from the Upper Permian and Lower Triassic of South Tibet and British Columbia: Evidence for a Diachronous Mass Extinction (Wignall and Newton 2003): Reply

Wignall, P.B. and Newton, R. (2004) Comment on: Contrasting Deep-water Records from the Upper Permian and Lower Triassic of South Tibet and British Columbia: Evidence for a Diachronous Mass Extinction (Wignall and Newton 2003): Reply. Palaios, 19 (1). pp. 102-104. ISSN 0883-1351

Full text available as:

Preview

Text wignallpb3.pdf Available under License : See the attached licence file. Download (101Kb)

Abstract

We are pleased that our paper has generated interest from Retallack and relish the opportunity to comment further on the intriguing timing of the end-Permian extinction. Perhaps not surprisingly, we do not agree with any of Retallack’s assertions and deal with them here in the order he presented them.

Item Type:	Article
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information:	Copyright © 2003, SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology)
Academic Units:	The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > School of Earth and Environment (Leeds)
Depositing User:	Sherpa Assistant
Date Deposited:	20 May 2005
Last Modified:	08 Feb 2013 17:01
Status:	Published
Refereed:	Yes
URI:	http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/477

Actions (login required)

View Item