Wignall, P.B. and Newton, R. (2004) Comment on: Contrasting Deep-water Records from the Upper Permian and Lower Triassic of South Tibet and British Columbia: Evidence for a Diachronous Mass Extinction (Wignall and Newton 2003): Reply. Palaios, 19 (1). pp. 102-104. ISSN 0883-1351
Full text available as:
![[img]](/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
| PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader 101Kb |
Abstract
We are pleased that our paper has generated interest from Retallack and relish the opportunity to comment further on the intriguing timing of the end-Permian extinction. Perhaps not surprisingly, we do not agree with any of Retallack’s assertions and deal with them here in the order he presented them.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | Copyright © 2003, SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) |
| Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > School of Earth and Environment (Leeds) |
| ID Code: | 477 |
| Deposited By: | Sherpa Assistant |
| Deposited On: | 20 May 2005 |
| Last Modified: | 05 Aug 2007 18:50 |
| Status: | Published |
| Refereed: | Yes |
Archive Staff Only: edit this record
