White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

Linking microseismic event observations with geomechanical models to minimise the risks of storing CO2 in geological formations

Verdon, JP, Kendall, JM, White, DJ and Angus, DA (2011) Linking microseismic event observations with geomechanical models to minimise the risks of storing CO2 in geological formations. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 305 (1-2). 143 - 152 . ISSN 0012-821X

Warning

There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
Text
EPSL-2011_with_coversheet.pdf - Submitted Version

Download (291Kb) | Preview

Abstract

For carbon capture and storage (CCS) in geological formations to be scientifically viable, we must be able to model and monitor the effects of geomechanical deformation on the integrity of the caprock. Excess deformation may open fractures, providing pathways for CO2 leakage from the reservoir. An acceptable geomechanical model must provide a good match with field observations. Microseismic activity is a direct manifestation of mechanical deformation, so it can be used to constrain geomechanical models. The aim of this paper is to develop the concept of using observations of microseismic activity to help ground truth geomechanical models. Microseismic monitoring has been ongoing at the Weyburn CO2 Storage and Monitoring Project since 2003. We begin this paper by presenting these microseismic observations. Less than 100 events have been recorded, documenting a low rate of seismicity. Most of the events are located close to nearby producing wells rather than the injection well, a pattern that is difficult to interpret within the conventional framework for injection-induced seismicity. Many events are located in the overburden. Without geomechanical simulation it is difficult to assess what these observations mean for the integrity of the storage formation. To address these uncertainties we generate numerical geomechanical models to simulate the changes in stress induced by CO2 injection, and use these models to predict the generation of microseismic events and seismic anisotropy. The initial geomechanical model that we generate, using material properties based on laboratory core measurements, does not provide a good match with either event locations or S-wave splitting measurements made on the microseismic events. We find that an alternative model whose reservoir is an order of magnitude softer than lab core-sample measurements provides a much better match with observation, as it leads shear stresses to increase above the production wells, promoting microseismicity in these areas, and generates changes in effective horizontal stresses that match well with Swave splitting observations. This agreement between geophysical observations and a softer-than-labmeasurements reservoir model highlights the difficulties encountered in upscaling lab scale results. There is a strong need to link geomechanical models with observable manifestations of deformation in the field, such as induced seismicity, for calibration. Only then can we accurately assess the risks of leakage generated by mechanical deformation.

Item Type: Article
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: (c) 2011, Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy
Keywords: geological carbon storage; Weyburn; carbon dioxide; passive seismic monitoring; geomechanical modelling
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > School of Earth and Environment (Leeds)
Depositing User: Symplectic Publications
Date Deposited: 19 Apr 2012 11:44
Last Modified: 20 Feb 2014 14:41
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.02.048
Status: Published
Publisher: Elsevier
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.02.048
URI: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/43865

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item