Should reference alternatives in pivot design SC surveys be treated differently?

This is the latest version of this eprint.

Hess, S and Rose, JM (2009) Should reference alternatives in pivot design SC surveys be treated differently? Environmental and Resource Economics, 42 (3). 297 - 317. ISSN 0924-6460

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
  • Hess, S
  • Rose, JM
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © 2009, Springer Verlag. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Environmental and Resource Economics. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The final publication is available at link.springer.com
Keywords: Stated choice; reference alternatives; discrete choice; random utility
Dates:
  • Published: March 2009
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > Institute for Transport Studies (Leeds)
Depositing User: Sherpa Assistant
Date Deposited: 17 Feb 2014 11:48
Last Modified: 27 Jul 2017 06:03
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9244-6
Status: Published
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9244-6

Available Versions of this Item

Share / Export

Statistics