White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

Priority Assessment Techniques Project Phase 2: Comparison of Scheme Rankings Using Six Priority Assessment Techniques

Simon, David (1987) Priority Assessment Techniques Project Phase 2: Comparison of Scheme Rankings Using Six Priority Assessment Techniques. Working Paper. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds , Leeds, UK.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
Text
ITS130_WP237_uploadable.pdf

Download (967Kb)
Published Version: http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/

Abstract

This paper presents and analyses the results of a quantitative comparison of six priority assessment techniques (PATs) using a sample of six schemes. The PATS were selected as a representative sample of those currently in use in the UK (see Working Paper 230 and Technical Note 190).

The results reveal significant differences in the project rankings between techniques, although these are reduced when problem, solution, or problem and solution oriented PATs are considered separately. The proportion of points allocated to particular objectives for individual schemes varies widely between PATs. Greater standardisation would probably be desireable.

Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: Copyright of the Institute of Transport Studies, University Of Leeds.
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > Institute for Transport Studies (Leeds)
Depositing User: Adrian May
Date Deposited: 12 Apr 2007
Last Modified: 06 Jun 2014 05:07
Published Version: http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/
Status: Published
Publisher: Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds
Identification Number: Working Paper 237
URI: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/2319

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item