Simon, David (1987) Priority Assessment Techniques Project Phase 2: Comparison of Scheme Rankings Using Six Priority Assessment Techniques. Working Paper. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds , Leeds, UK.
This paper presents and analyses the results of a quantitative comparison of six priority assessment techniques (PATs) using a sample of six schemes. The PATS were selected as a representative sample of those currently in use in the UK (see Working Paper 230 and Technical Note 190).
The results reveal significant differences in the project rankings between techniques, although these are reduced when problem, solution, or problem and solution oriented PATs are considered separately. The proportion of points allocated to particular objectives for individual schemes varies widely between PATs. Greater standardisation would probably be desireable.
|Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information:||Copyright of the Institute of Transport Studies, University Of Leeds.|
|Institution:||The University of Leeds|
|Academic Units:||The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > Institute for Transport Studies (Leeds)|
|Depositing User:||Adrian May|
|Date Deposited:||12 Apr 2007|
|Last Modified:||24 Apr 2016 21:59|
|Publisher:||Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds|
|Identification Number:||Working Paper 237|