White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

Evaluation of the Use and Non-Use Benefits of Public Transport: Report Number 2 – Application of the Method.

Bristow, A.L., Hopkinson, P.G., Nash, C.A. and Wardman, M.R. (1991) Evaluation of the Use and Non-Use Benefits of Public Transport: Report Number 2 – Application of the Method. Working Paper. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds , Leeds, UK.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
Text
ITS48_WP310_uploadable.pdf
Available under licence : See the attached licence file.

Download (408Kb)
Published Version: http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/

Abstract

In this paper, we present results of a survey designed to discover the value people place on the retention of a bus service. The survey consisted of two parts; a travel diary, and a follow-up interview designed to explore respondents' reactions to removal of the bus services and the willingness to pay for its retention. The survey was undertaken in two contrasting areas: Hawksworth, in Leeds, a low income area of predominantly Council housing and Rainow, in Cheshire, a village with high car and home ownership. Most respondents in Hawksworth were regular bus users; the reverse was the case in Rainow.

Typically, it appeared that bus users enjoy a consumer surplus on their journeys of the order of 100% with a higher value for the small number of work journeys in Rainow. Non-use values appear to be very significant, with a higher valuation amongst non-users than users. On average, residents were willing to pay some 60 pence per week to preserve the route as a whole. In Hawksworth, the corresponding values were 50 pence for the specific route serving the estate, and 75 pence for the network as a whole. It was generally agreed that services to workplaces, shops, schools and medical facilities were the highest priority, with weekday peak and weekday busy time services taking priority over Saturdays, evening and Sundays. In terms of priority groups, pensioners were always ranked first; in general these were followed by the unemployed and children; non-users in Hawksworth however ranked the unemployed last.

The practical use of these results will be considered in a further project looking at actual and potential ways for ranking services for subsidy.

Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: Copyright of the Institute of Transport Studies, University Of Leeds
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > Institute for Transport Studies (Leeds)
Depositing User: Adrian May
Date Deposited: 23 Mar 2007
Last Modified: 05 Jun 2014 13:22
Published Version: http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/
Status: Published
Publisher: Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds
Identification Number: Working Paper 310
URI: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/2248

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item