White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

A Comparison of System Optimal and User Optimal Route Guidance.

Watling, D. (1990) A Comparison of System Optimal and User Optimal Route Guidance. Working Paper. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds , Leeds, UK.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
Text
ITS228_WP316_uploadable.pdf
Available under licence : See the attached licence file.

Download (401Kb)
Published Version: http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/

Abstract

The work described in this paper (carried out under the EC `DRIVE' programme) extends the simulations described in Working Paper 315, with the aim of studying the likely benefits to and reactions of drivers to system optimal (SO) route guidance - in particular, these effects are compared with those obtained under user optimal (UE) guidance. The model used is again one of a multiple user class equilibrium assignment, so that equipped drivers may be directed to more than one route per origin-destination movement. UE and SO guidance are compared, at different levels of equipped vehicles and demand levels, on the basis of the number of routes they recommend and the similarity of the flows on these routes, as well as link-based properties such as actual flows and queues resulting. These serve to demonstrate the extent to which the routes recommended under UE guidance serve as proxies to those under SO guidance. Secondly, a comparison is made of average (dis)benefits to guided drivers as well as the excess travel time incurred by individual equipped drivers in following SO, as opposed to UE guidance, in order to determine the extent of user sub-optimality of SO routing. Thirdly, input from a parallel DRIVE project, investigating user reactions to guidance information, is used to infer the extent to which drivers are likely to accept the sub-optimality of SO guidance, and the factors which are likely to influence their acceptance. Finally, some preliminary analysis is performed on combined strategies, which aim to strike a balance between the system benefits of SO guidance and the user benefits of UE routing.

Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: Copyright of the Institute of Transport Studies, University Of Leeds
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Environment (Leeds) > Institute for Transport Studies (Leeds)
Depositing User: Adrian May
Date Deposited: 04 May 2007
Last Modified: 10 Jun 2014 02:27
Published Version: http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/
Status: Published
Publisher: Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds
Identification Number: Working Paper 316
URI: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/2242

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item