Anokye, N., Coyle, K., Relton, C. et al. (3 more authors) (2020) Cost-effectiveness of offering an area-level financial incentive on breast feeding : a within-cluster randomised controlled trial analysis. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 105 (2). pp. 155-159. ISSN 0003-9888
Abstract
Objective: To provide the first estimate of the cost effectiveness of financial incentive for breastfeeding intervention compared with usual care.
Design: Within-cluster (‘ward’ level) RCT cost-effectiveness analysis.
Setting: Five local authority districts in the north of England Participants: 5,398 mother-infant dyads (intervention arm), 4612 mother-infant dyads (control arm).
Interventions: Offering a financial incentive (over a 6 month period) on breastfeeding to women living in areas with low breastfeeding prevalence (<40% at 6–8 weeks).
Main outcome measures: Babies breastfed (receiving breastmilk) at 6–8week, and cost per additional baby breastfed.
Methods: Costs were compared to differences in area level data on babies’ breastfed in order to estimate a cost per additional baby breastfed and the quality adjusted life year (QALY) gains required over the lifetime of babies to justify intervention cost.
Results: In the trial, the total cost of providing the intervention in 46 wards was £462,600, with an average cost per ward of £9,989 and per baby of £91. At follow up, area-level breastfeeding prevalence at 6-8 weeks was 31.7% (95% CI, 29.4-34.0) in control areas and 37.9% (95% CI, 35.0-40.8) in intervention areas. The adjusted difference between intervention and control was 5.7 percentage points (95% CI, 2.7-8.6; P < .001), resulting in 10 (95% CI 6 to 14) more additional babies breastfed in the intervention wards (39 vs 29). The cost per additional baby breastfed at 6-8 weeks was £974. At a cost per QALY threshold of £20,000 (recommended in England), an additional breastfed baby would need to show a QALY gain of 0.05 over their lifetime to justify the intervention cost. If decision-makers are willing to pay £974 (or more) per additional baby breastfed at a QALY gain of 0.05, then this intervention could be costeffective. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion: This study provides information to help inform public health guidance on breastfeeding. To make the economic case unequivocal, evidence on the varied and long-term health benefits of breastfeeding to both the baby and mother and the effectiveness of financial incentives for breastfeeding beyond 6-8 weeks is required.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2019 The Authors. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > ScHARR - Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research |
Funding Information: | Funder Grant number Medical Research Council MR/J000434/1; MR/J000434/1; MR/J000434/1 |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 13 Aug 2019 09:38 |
Last Modified: | 09 Dec 2021 12:04 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | BMJ Publishing Group |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316741 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:149316 |