Agreed Damages, The Penalty Rule and Unfair Terms: An Anglo-Australian and Chinese Comparison

Halson, R and Liu, Q (2019) Agreed Damages, The Penalty Rule and Unfair Terms: An Anglo-Australian and Chinese Comparison. Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 7 (1). pp. 49-94. ISSN 2050-4802

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
  • Halson, R
  • Liu, Q
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: (c) 2019, The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. This is an author produced version of a paper published in the Chinese Journal of Comparative Law. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.
Keywords: Contractual penalty; agreed/liquidated damages; Cavendish Square v Makdessi; Parking Eye v Beavis; Chinese Contract Law article 114; Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group
Dates:
  • Published: June 2019
  • Accepted: 27 March 2019
  • Published (online): 13 May 2019
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Law (Leeds) > School of Law (Leeds)
Depositing User: Symplectic Publications
Date Deposited: 10 Apr 2019 09:52
Last Modified: 02 Jul 2019 12:03
Status: Published
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxz003

Download

Accepted Version


Embargoed until: 13 May 2021

Filename: Penalty Joint Paper finalised CJCL with abstract and key words rev QL and RH clean.pdf

Request a copy

Share / Export

Statistics