Srivastava, T., Prabhu, V.S., Li, H. et al. (7 more authors) (2020) Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as second-line therapy for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Sweden. European Urology Oncology, 3 (5). pp. 663-670. ISSN 2588-9311
Abstract
Background: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common subtype of bladder cancer. The randomized phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial showed that pembrolizumab, used as second-line therapy significantly prolonged overall survival with fewer treatment-related adverse events than chemotherapy for advanced UC. Pembro- lizumab has been approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic UC in adults who have received platinum-contain- ing chemotherapy. Many European countries use cost-effectiveness analysis to inform reimbursement decisions.
Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as second-line ther- apy for the treatment of advanced UC from a Swedish health care perspective. Design, setting, and participants: We developed a partitioned-survival model to assess the costs and effectiveness of pembrolizumab compared with vinflunine (base case), paclitaxel, or docetaxel monotherapy in patients with advanced UC over a 15-yr time horizon. We obtained Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival end- points, adverse events, and utility data from KEYNOTE-045.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We performed parametric extra- polations to estimate overall and progression-free survival beyond the clinical trial period. Swedish costs and utility weights were used to estimate total costs, quality- adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to assess the ro- bustness of the model results.
Results and limitations: In the base-case analysis, pembrolizumab resulted in a mean survival gain of 1.66 years (1.38 QALYs) at an incremental cost of s69 852 and an ICER of s50 529/QALY gained versus vinflunine monotherapy. ICERs for other chemotherapies were s81 356/QALY for pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel or doc- etaxel monotherapy, and s71924/QALY for pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine monotherapy. Long-term follow-up from KEYNOTE-045 and real-world data are needed to validate the extrapolations.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Authors/Creators: |
|
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: | © 2018 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and The Authors. Published Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
Keywords: | Bladder cancer; Cost-effectiveness; Immunotherapy; Pembrolizumab; Urothelial carcinoma |
Dates: |
|
Institution: | The University of Sheffield |
Academic Units: | The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > ScHARR - Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research |
Depositing User: | Symplectic Sheffield |
Date Deposited: | 15 Mar 2019 11:47 |
Last Modified: | 24 Nov 2021 10:14 |
Status: | Published |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Refereed: | Yes |
Identification Number: | 10.1016/j.euo.2018.09.012 |
Open Archives Initiative ID (OAI ID): | oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:139917 |