Why rational argument fails the genetic modification (GM) debate

Mallinson, L., Russell, J. orcid.org/0000-0002-4174-7210, Cameron, D.D. orcid.org/0000-0002-5439-6544 et al. (3 more authors) (2018) Why rational argument fails the genetic modification (GM) debate. Food Security. ISSN 1876-4517

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Keywords: Genetic modification debate; Attitudinal survey; Rationality; Affect; Food
Dates:
  • Accepted: 14 August 2018
  • Published (online): 1 October 2018
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Science (Sheffield) > School of Biological Sciences (Sheffield) > Department of Animal and Plant Sciences (Sheffield)
The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Science (Sheffield) > School of Biological Sciences (Sheffield) > Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (Sheffield)
The University of Sheffield > Professional Services (Sheffield)
Depositing User: Symplectic Sheffield
Date Deposited: 17 Oct 2018 10:16
Last Modified: 17 Oct 2018 10:16
Published Version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0832-1
Status: Published online
Publisher: Springer
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0832-1

Share / Export

Statistics