Exploring gap filling as a cheaper alternative to reading comprehension questionnaires when evaluating machine translation for gisting

Forcada, M.L., Scarton, C., Specia, L. orcid.org/0000-0002-5495-3128 et al. (2 more authors) (2018) Exploring gap filling as a cheaper alternative to reading comprehension questionnaires when evaluating machine translation for gisting. In: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Machine Translation. Third Conference on Machine Translation (WMT18), 31 Oct - 01 Nov 2018, Brussels, Belgium. ACL , pp. 192-203.

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © 2018 ACL. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Dates:
  • Published (online): 31 October 2018
  • Published: 31 October 2018
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Engineering (Sheffield) > Department of Computer Science (Sheffield)
Depositing User: Symplectic Sheffield
Date Deposited: 02 Nov 2018 09:32
Last Modified: 16 Nov 2018 10:40
Published Version: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-64020
Status: Published
Publisher: ACL
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-64020
Related URLs:

Download

Share / Export

Statistics