Supplementary search methods were more effective and offered better value than bibliographic database searching: a case study from public health and environmental enhancement

Cooper, C. orcid.org/0000-0003-0864-5607, Lovell, R., Husk, K. et al. (2 more authors) (2017) Supplementary search methods were more effective and offered better value than bibliographic database searching: a case study from public health and environmental enhancement. Research Synthesis Methods. ISSN 1759-2879

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Cooper C, Lovell R, Husk K, Booth A, Garside R. Supplementary search methods were more effective and offered better value than bibliographic database searching: a case study from public health and environmental enhancement. Res Syn Meth. 2017, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1286. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
Keywords: Cochrane systematic reviews; Public health; information science; literature searching; sensitivity analysis
Dates:
  • Published (online): 29 November 2017
  • Accepted: 31 October 2017
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research
Depositing User: Symplectic Sheffield
Date Deposited: 14 Dec 2017 12:15
Last Modified: 29 Nov 2018 01:38
Published Version: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1286
Status: Published online
Publisher: Wiley
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1286
Related URLs:

Share / Export

Statistics