White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

Evidence of preference construction in a comparison of variants of the standard gamble method

Brazier, J. and Dolan, P. (2005) Evidence of preference construction in a comparison of variants of the standard gamble method. Discussion Paper. (Unpublished)

[img] Text

Download (211Kb)


An increasingly important debate has emerged around the extent to which techniques such as the standard gamble, which is used, amongst other things, to value health states, actually serve to construct respondents' preferences rather than simply elicit them. According to standard theory, the variant used should have no bearing on the numbers elicited from respondents, i.e. procedural invariance should hold. This study addresses this debate by comparing two variants of standard gamble in the valuation of health states. It is a mixed methods study that combines a quantitative comparison with the probing of respondents in order to ascertain possible reasons for the differences that emerged. Significant differences were found between variants and, furthermore, there was evidence of an ordering effect. Respondents' responses to probing suggested that they were influenced by the method of elicitation.

Item Type: Monograph (Discussion Paper)
Keywords: preference construction, anchoring effects, ordering effects, standard gamble, health valuation
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > Health Economics and Decision Science > HEDS Discussion Paper Series
Depositing User: ScHARR / HEDS (Sheffield)
Date Deposited: 22 Jun 2010 13:52
Last Modified: 19 Jun 2014 10:46
Status: Unpublished
Identification Number: HEDS Discussion Paper 05/04
URI: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/10936

Actions (repository staff only: login required)