Akopian, V., Andrews, P.W., Beil, S., Benvenisty, N., Brehm, J., Christie, M., Ford, A., Fox, V., Gokhale, P.J., Healy, L., Holm, F., Hovatta, O., Knowles, B.B., Ludwig, T.E., McKay, R.D.G., Miyazaki, T., Nakatsuji, N., Oh, S.K.W., Pera, M.F., Rossant, J., Stacey, G.N. and Suemori, H. (2010) Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal, 46 (3-4). pp. 247-258. ISSN 1071-2690Full text not available from this repository.
There are many reports of defined culture systems for the propagation of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder cell support, but no previous study has undertaken a multi-laboratory comparison of these diverse methodologies. In this study, five separate laboratories, each with experience in human embryonic stem cell culture, used a panel of ten embryonic stem cell lines (including WA09 as an index cell line common to all laboratories) to assess eight cell culture methods, with propagation in the presence of Knockout Serum Replacer, FGF-2, and mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cell layers serving as a positive control. The cultures were assessed for up to ten passages for attachment, death, and differentiated morphology by phase contrast microscopy, for growth by serial cell counts, and for maintenance of stem cell surface marker expression by flow cytometry. Of the eight culture systems, only the control and those based on two commercial media, mTeSR1 and STEMPRO, supported maintenance of most cell lines for ten passages. Cultures grown in the remaining media failed before this point due to lack of attachment, cell death, or overt cell differentiation. Possible explanations for relative success of the commercial formulations in this study, and the lack of success with other formulations from academic groups compared to previously published results, include: the complex combination of growth factors present in the commercial preparations; improved development, manufacture, and quality control in the commercial products; differences in epigenetic adaptation to culture in vitro between different ES cell lines grown in different laboratories.
|Keywords:||Human embryonic stem cell; Cell culture; Defined cell culture media; Comparative study|
|Institution:||The University of Sheffield|
|Academic Units:||The University of Sheffield > University of Sheffield Research Centres and Institutes > Centre for Stem Cell Biology (Sheffield)|
|Depositing User:||Miss Anthea Tucker|
|Date Deposited:||25 May 2010 08:54|
|Last Modified:||25 May 2010 08:54|