Baxter, S., Killoran, A., Kelly, M. and Goyder, E. (2010) Synthesising diverse evidence: the use of primary qualitative data analysis methods and logic models in public health reviews. Public Health, 124 (2). pp. 99-106. ISSN 0033-3506
This is the latest version of this eprint.
Objectives: The nature of public health evidence presents challenges for conventional systematic review processes, with increasing recognition of the need to include a broader range of work including observational studies and qualitative research, yet with methods to combine diverse sources remaining underdeveloped. The objective of this paper is to report the application of a new approach for review of evidence in the public health sphere. The method enables a diverse range of evidence types to be synthesised in order to examine potential relationships between a public health environment and outcomes.
Study design: The study draws on previous work by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence on conceptual frameworks. It applied and further extended this work to the synthesis of evidence relating to one particular public health area, the enhancing of employee mental wellbeing in the workplace.
Methods: The approach utilised thematic analysis techniques from primary research together with conceptual modelling to explore potential relationships between factors and outcomes.
Results: The method enabled a logic framework to be built from a diverse document set that illustrates how elements and associations between elements may impact on the wellbeing of employees.
Conclusions: Whilst recognising potential criticisms of the approach, it is suggested that logic models can be a useful way of examining the complexity of relationships between factors and outcomes in public health, and of highlighting potential areas for interventions and further research. The use of techniques from primary qualitative research may also be helpful in synthesising diverse document types.
|Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information:||Copyright © 2010 The Royal Society for Public Health. This is an author produced version of a paper accepted for publication in "Public Health". Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.|
|Keywords:||systematic review, evidence synthesis, public health policy|
|Institution:||The University of Sheffield|
|Academic Units:||The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > Section of Public Health (Sheffield)|
|Depositing User:||Repository Officer|
|Date Deposited:||18 May 2010 17:47|
|Last Modified:||08 Feb 2013 17:00|
Available Versions of this Item
Synthesising diverse evidence: the use of primary qualitative data analysis methods and logic models in public health reviews. (deposited 11 Feb 2010 18:51)
- Synthesising diverse evidence: the use of primary qualitative data analysis methods and logic models in public health reviews. (deposited 18 May 2010 17:47) [Currently Displayed]