White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

Systematic reviews of complementary therapies - an annotated bibliography. Part 1: Acupuncture

Thormählen, J., Berman, B., Linde, K., Vickers, A., Hondras, M., ter Riet, G. and Melchart, D. (2001) Systematic reviews of complementary therapies - an annotated bibliography. Part 1: Acupuncture. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. ISSN 1472-6882

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
Text (bmc_1472-6882-1-3.pdf)
bmc_1472-6882-1-3.pdf

Download (422Kb)

Abstract

Background Complementary therapies are widespread but controversial. We aim to provide a comprehensive collection and a summary of systematic reviews of clinical trials in three major complementary therapies (acupuncture, herbal medicine, homeopathy). This article is dealing with acupuncture. Potentially relevant reviews were searched through the register of the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field, the Cochrane Library, Medline, and bibliographies of articles and books. To be included articles had to review prospective clinical trials of acupuncture; had to describe review methods explicitly; had to be published; and had to focus on treatment effects. Information on conditions, interventions, methods, results and conclusions was extracted using a pretested form and summarized descriptively. Results From a total of 48 potentially relevant reviews preselected in a screeening process 39 met the inclusion criteria. 22 were on various pain syndromes or rheumatic diseases. Other topics addressed by more than one review were addiction, nausea, asthma and tinnitus. Almost unanimously the reviews state that acupuncture trials include too few patients. Often included trials are heterogeneous regarding patients, interventions and outcome measures, are considered to have insufficient quality and contradictory results. Convincing evidence is available only for postoperative nausea, for which acupuncture appears to be of benefit, and smoking cessation, where acupuncture is no more effective than sham acupuncture. Conclusions A large number of systematic reviews on acupuncture exists. What is most obvious from these reviews is the need for (the funding of) well-designed, larger clinical trials.

Item Type: Article
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © 2001 Linde et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
Academic Units: The University of York > Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (York)
Depositing User: Repository Officer
Date Deposited: 17 Feb 2006
Last Modified: 17 Oct 2013 14:35
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-1-3
Status: Published
Refereed: Yes
Related URLs:
URI: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/1041

Actions (repository staff only: login required)