White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

What We Owe to Distant Others

Wenar, Leif (2003) What We Owe to Distant Others. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 2 (3). pp. 284-304. ISSN 1741-3060

Full text not available from this repository.

Published Version: http://ppe.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/283

Abstract

What morality requires of us in a world of poverty and inequality depends both on what our duties are in the abstract, and on what we can do to help. T.M. Scanlon's contractualism addresses the first question. I suggest that contractualism isolates the moral factors that frame our deliberations about the extent of our obligations in situations of need. To this extent, contractualism clarifies our common-sense understanding of our duties to distant others. The second, empirical question then becomes vital. What we as individuals need to know is how to fulfil our duties to the distant poor. Moral theorists tend to base their prescriptions on simple assumptions about how the rich can help the poor. Yet a survey of the empirical literature shows how urgently we need more information on this topic before we can know what contractualist morality — or any plausible morality — requires of us.

Item Type:Article
Keywords:Scanlon, contractualism, global justice, global poverty, aid effectiveness
Academic Units:The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Arts and Humanities (Sheffield) > Department of Philosophy (Sheffield)
ID Code:1020
Deposited By:Leif Wenar
Deposited On:12 Apr 2006
Last Modified:05 Aug 2007 19:05
Published Version:http://ppe.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/2/3/283
Status:Published
Refereed:No
Identification Number:doi:10.1177/1470594X030023001

Archive Staff Only: edit this record