Appraising the Costs of Genomic Testing for Histology-Independent Technologies : An Illustrative Example for NTRK Fusions

Beresford, Lucy, Murphy, Peter, Dias, Sofia orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-0221 et al. (7 more authors) (2022) Appraising the Costs of Genomic Testing for Histology-Independent Technologies : An Illustrative Example for NTRK Fusions. Value in Health. pp. 1133-1140. ISSN 1524-4733

Abstract

Metadata

Item Type: Article
Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: Funding Information: The authors acknowledge colleagues in the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and Centre for Health Economics Technology Assessment Group, University of York, who contributed to early discussions on this topic: R. Hodgson, A. Llewellyn, P. Murphy, L. Claxton, L. Beresford, M. Walton, D. Glynn, K. Wright, and S. Dias. Entrectinib for treating NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors: a single technology appraisal. CRD and CHE, University of York, Technology Assessment Group, 2019. Funding Information: Funding/Support: This article is based on work completed for the Single Technology Assessment of Entrectinib and Larotrectinib commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Program, projects numbers NIHR128763 and NIHR127895. This work is also based on ongoing work conducted for the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Program commissioned project: Modeling approaches for site-agnostic cancer drugs to inform National Institute for Health and Care Excellence appraisals, project number NIHR127852. Funding Information: Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Miss Beresford reported receiving funding from the National Institute for Health Research as part of the Systematic Review Training Fellowship Scheme. Dr Metcalf reported receiving grants or contracts from Sanofi; receiving consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; receiving payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or other educational events from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Sharp & Dohme; being a member of a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Achilles Therapeutics, Roche, and Bayer; and receiving support for attending and travelling to meetings from Bayer, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. No other disclosures were reported. © 2021, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy.
Keywords: cancer, decision making, genomic testing, health technology appraisal, histology independent technologies, targeted therapies
Dates:
  • Accepted: 15 November 2021
  • Published (online): 29 June 2022
  • Published: 1 July 2022
Institution: The University of York
Academic Units: The University of York > Faculty of Social Sciences (York) > Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (York)
The University of York > Faculty of Social Sciences (York) > Centre for Health Economics (York)
The University of York > Faculty of Sciences (York) > Health Sciences (York)
Depositing User: Pure (York)
Date Deposited: 24 Jun 2022 10:20
Last Modified: 17 Mar 2024 00:15
Published Version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1359
Status: Published
Refereed: Yes
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1359
Related URLs:

Download

Filename: FINAL_VIH_Manuscript.pdf

Description: FINAL VIH Manuscript

Licence: CC-BY-NC-ND 2.5

Export

Statistics