Variation in methods, results and reporting in electronic health record-based studies evaluating routine care in gout: A systematic review

Crossfield, SSR orcid.org/0000-0001-7337-3527, Lai, LYH, Kingsbury, SR et al. (4 more authors) (2019) Variation in methods, results and reporting in electronic health record-based studies evaluating routine care in gout: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 14 (10). e0224272. ISSN 1932-6203

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © 2019 Crossfield et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Dates:
  • Accepted: 10 October 2019
  • Published (online): 24 October 2019
  • Published: 24 October 2019
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Engineering & Physical Sciences (Leeds) > School of Computing (Leeds)
The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine (LICAMM) > Specialist Science Education Dept (Leeds)
The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Institute of Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM) (Leeds) > Musculoskeletal Medicine & Imaging (Leeds)
The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Leeds Institute of Health Sciences (Leeds) > Centre for Health Services Research (Leeds)
Funding Information:
FunderGrant number
MRCMR/L01629X/1
Versus Arthritis (formerly ARUK)20083
Depositing User: Symplectic Publications
Date Deposited: 11 Oct 2019 12:23
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2019 12:02
Status: Published
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224272

Export

Statistics