Everything you always wanted to know about sex (in IR) but were afraid to ask: thee ‘queer turn’ in international relations

Queer IR’s momentum in the past four years has made it inconceivable for disciplinary IR to make it ‘appear as if there is no Queer International Theory.’ The ‘queer turn’ has given rise to vibrant research programs across IR subfields. Queer research is not only not a frivolous distraction from the ‘hard’ issues of IR, but queer analytics crack open for investigation fundamental dimensions of international politics that have hitherto been missed, misunderstood or trivialized by mainstream and critical approaches to IR. As queer research is making significant inroads into IR theorizing, a fault line has emerged in IR scholarship on sexuality and queerness. Reflecting the tensions between LGBT studies and queer theory in the academy more broadly, the IR literature on (homo)sexuality largely coalesces into two distinct approaches: LGBT and Queer approaches. The article will lay out the basic tenets of queer theory and discuss how it diverges from LGBT studies. The essay then turns to the books under review and focuses on the ways in which they take up the most prominent issue in contemporary debates in queer theory: the increasing inclusion of LGBT people into international human rights regimes and liberal states and markets. The article finishes with a brief reflection on citation practices, queer methodologies and the ethics of queer research.