Response to: ‘Let's stop fooling ourselves. In RA, only ACR/EULAR criteria define remission and equate with absence of disease!’ by Boers

Emery, P, Bingham III, CO, Burmester, GR et al. (11 more authors) (2016) Response to: ‘Let's stop fooling ourselves. In RA, only ACR/EULAR criteria define remission and equate with absence of disease!’ by Boers. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 75 (10). e69. ISSN 0003-4967

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
  • Emery, P
  • Bingham III, CO
  • Burmester, GR
  • Bykerk, VP
  • Furst, DE
  • Mariette, X
  • van der Heijde, D
  • van Vollenhoven, R
  • Arendt, C
  • Mountian, I
  • Purcaru, O
  • Tatla, D
  • VanLunen, B
  • Weinblatt, ME
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © 2016, the authors. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.
Dates:
  • Accepted: 3 July 2016
  • Published (online): 12 August 2016
  • Published: October 2016
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Medicine and Health (Leeds) > School of Medicine (Leeds) > Institute of Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM) (Leeds) > Clinical Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM) (Leeds)
Depositing User: Symplectic Publications
Date Deposited: 22 Jul 2016 10:35
Last Modified: 12 Apr 2017 06:58
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210083
Status: Published
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210083

Export

Statistics


CORE (COnnecting REpositories)