White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

Barriers and facilitators to use of high technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis

Baxter, S., Enderby, P., Judge, S. and Evans, P. (2012) Barriers and facilitators to use of high technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 47 (2). pp. 115-129. ISSN 1368-2822

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
Text
WRRO_74332.pdf

Download (146Kb)

Abstract

Background: There has been a rapid growth in recent years of available technologies for individuals with communication difficulties. Research in the area is currently under-developed with practitioners having a limited body of work to draw on to guide the process of intervention. Concerns have been raised that this newly-developed technology may have limited functional usage.

Aims: This review aimed to investigate the potential barriers and facilitators to high tech AAC provision and its ongoing use. The aim of the analysis was to explore factors underpinning use rather than effectiveness, thus it synthesised data from predominantly qualitative and survey studies reporting the views and perceptions of AAC users or staff providing the devices.

Main Contribution: The review highlights the range of factors that can impact on provision and use of high tech AAC, which practitioners should consider and address as appropriate in the intervention process. These include: ease of use of the device; reliability; availability of technical support; the voice/language of the device; the decision-making process; the time taken to generate a message; family perceptions and support; communication partner responses; service provision; and the knowledge and skills of staff. The work outlines how qualitative synthesis review methods may be applied to the consideration of published material that is not reporting outcomes data, and how this may provide valuable information to inform future studies.

Conclusions: Practitioners should be aware of barriers and facilitators to successful use when making recommendations, and consider how barriers where present, might be overcome. Aspects of service delivery such as ongoing technical support and staff training may require further consideration. The synthesis of evidence describing views of users and providers, and the implementation of high tech AAC systems, can provide valuable data to inform intervention studies and functional outcome measures.

Item Type: Article
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © 2011 Royal College of Speech and Langage Therapists. This is an author's pre-print version of a paper subsequently published in International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.
Keywords: augmentative and alternative communication, systematic review, assistive technology
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > Section of Public Health (Sheffield)
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email s.k.baxter@sheffield.ac.uk
Date Deposited: 13 Jun 2012 09:14
Last Modified: 08 Feb 2013 17:39
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00090.x
Status: Published
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell, for the Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists
Refereed: No
Identification Number: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00090.x
URI: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/74332

Actions (repository staff only: login required)