White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

Is self-care a cost-effective use of resources? Evidence from a randomised trial in inflammatory bowel disease

Richardson, G., Sculpher, M., Kennedy, A., Nelson, E., Reeves, D., Roberts, C., Robinson, A., Rogers, A. and Thompson, D. (2006) Is self-care a cost-effective use of resources? Evidence from a randomised trial in inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 11 ( 4). pp. 225-230. ISSN 1355-8196

Full text not available from this repository.


Objectives: To determine if a whole-system approach to self-management in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), using a guidebook developed with patients and physicians trained in patient-centred care, leads to cost-effective use of health system resources.

Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis over a one-year time horizon comparing the whole systems self-management approach to treatment with usual treatment. Nineteen hospitals in the northwest England were randomized to the intervention or to be controls; 651 patients (285 at intervention sites and 366 at control sites) with established IBD were included. The economic evaluation related differential health service costs, from a UK NHS perspective, to differences in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) based on patients' responses to the EQ-5D.

Results: The intervention was associated with a mean reduction in costs of £148 per patient and a small mean reduction in QALYs of 0.00022 per patient compared with the control group. This resulted in an incremental cost per QALY gained of £676,417 for treatment as usual and a probability of around 63% that the whole-system approach to self-management is cost-effective, assuming a willingness to pay up to £30,000 for an additional QALY.

Conclusions: Although there is uncertainty associated with these estimates, more widespread use of this method in chronic disease management seems likely to reduce health care costs without evidence of adverse effect on patient outcomes.

Item Type: Article
Institution: The University of York
Academic Units: The University of York > Centre for Health Economics (York)
Depositing User: York RAE Import
Date Deposited: 01 Jun 2009 12:15
Last Modified: 01 Jun 2009 12:15
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/135581906778476508
Status: Published
Publisher: Royal Society of Medicine
Identification Number: 10.1258/135581906778476508
URI: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/6701

Actions (repository staff only: login required)