Lang, GR (2012) Invigilating Republican Liberty. The Philosophical Quarterly. ISSN 1467-9213
Full text available as:
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00015.x
Abstract
Republican liberty, as recently defended by Philip Pettit and Quentin Skinner, characterises liberty in terms of the absence of domination, instead of, or in addition to, the absence of interference, as favoured by Berlin-style negative liberty. This article considers several claims made on behalf of republican liberty, particularly in Pettit's and Skinner's recent writings, and finds them wanting. No relevant moral or political concern expressed by republicans, it will be contended here, fails to be accommodated by negative liberty.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Academic Units: | The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts (Leeds) > School of Humanities (Leeds) > School of Philosophy (Leeds) |
| Depositing User: | Symplectic Publications |
| Date Deposited: | 05 Jan 2012 12:44 |
| Last Modified: | 08 Feb 2013 17:36 |
| Published Version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00015.x |
| Status: | Published |
| Publisher: | John Wiley & Sons |
| Identification Number: | 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.00015.x |
| URI: | http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/43546 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
