Katzav, J. and Reed, C. (2008) Modelling argument recognition and reconstruction. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (1). pp. 155-172. ISSN 0378-2166Full text available as:
Available under licence : See the attached licence file.
A growing body of recent work in informal logic investigates the process of argumentation. Among other things, this work focuses on the ways in which individuals attempt to understand written or verbalised arguments in light of the fact that these are often presented in forms that are incomplete and unmarked. One of its aims is to develop general procedures for natural language argument recognition and reconstruction. Our aim here is to draw on this growing body of knowledge in informal logic in order to take preliminary steps towards developing an architecture for computer systems that are able to recognise and reconstruct natural language arguments. This architecture aims to structure research of an applied and computational nature that strives to implement linguistic systems of various sorts, and to analyse problems in a way that both yields manageable and relatively independent components and also highlights how implementations can interact with existing resources from natural language processing.
|Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information:||© 2007 Elsevier B.V. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Journal of Pragmatics. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.|
|Institution:||The University of Leeds|
|Academic Units:||The University of Leeds > Faculty of Arts (Leeds) > School of Humanities (Leeds) > School of Philosophy (Leeds)|
|Depositing User:||Leeds Philosophy Department|
|Date Deposited:||10 Oct 2007 12:34|
|Last Modified:||08 Feb 2013 17:04|