Protocol 15 and articles 10 and 11 ECHR—The partial triumph of political incumbency post-Brighton?

Cram, I (2018) Protocol 15 and articles 10 and 11 ECHR—The partial triumph of political incumbency post-Brighton? International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 67 (3). pp. 477-503. ISSN 0020-5893

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
  • Cram, I
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: © 2018, British Institute of International and Comparative Law. This article has been published in a revised form in International & Comparative Law Quarterly https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589318000118. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.
Keywords: Human Rights; Brighton Declaration; Copenhagen Declaration; margin of appreciation; political expression; political incumbency; subsidiarity
Dates:
  • Published: July 2018
  • Accepted: 12 March 2018
  • Published (online): 15 April 2018
Institution: The University of Leeds
Academic Units: The University of Leeds > Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Law (Leeds) > School of Law (Leeds)
Depositing User: Symplectic Publications
Date Deposited: 14 Mar 2018 16:15
Last Modified: 17 Jul 2018 08:14
Status: Published
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Identification Number: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589318000118

Share / Export

Statistics