Consistency between direct trial evidence and Bayesian Mixed Treatment Comparison: Is head-to-head evidence always more reliable?

Madan, J., Cooper, K.L., Stevenson, M.D. et al. (2 more authors) (2009) Consistency between direct trial evidence and Bayesian Mixed Treatment Comparison: Is head-to-head evidence always more reliable? Discussion Paper. (Unpublished)

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
  • Madan, J. (jason.madan@bristol.ac.uk)
  • Cooper, K.L. (k.l.cooper@sheffield.ac.uk)
  • Stevenson, M.D. (m.d.stevenson@sheffield.ac.uk)
  • Whyte, S. (sophie.whyte@sheffield.ac.uk)
  • Akehurst, R. (r.l.akehurst@sheffield.ac.uk)
Keywords: Bayesian methods, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, G-CSFs, febrile neutropenia, mixed treatment comparison, methodology
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > Health Economics and Decision Science > HEDS Discussion Paper Series
Depositing User: ScHARR / HEDS (Sheffield)
Date Deposited: 15 Jun 2010 14:38
Last Modified: 05 Jun 2014 08:31
Status: Unpublished
Identification Number: HEDS Discussion Paper 09/08

Download

Filename: HEDS_DP_09-08.pdf

Share / Export

Statistics