Consistency between direct trial evidence and Bayesian Mixed Treatment Comparison: Is head-to-head evidence always more reliable?

Warning

There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.

Madan, J., Cooper, K.L., Stevenson, M.D. et al. (2 more authors) (2009) Consistency between direct trial evidence and Bayesian Mixed Treatment Comparison: Is head-to-head evidence always more reliable? Discussion Paper. (Unpublished)

Abstract

Metadata

Authors/Creators:
  • Madan, J. (jason.madan@bristol.ac.uk)
  • Cooper, K.L. (k.l.cooper@sheffield.ac.uk)
  • Stevenson, M.D. (m.d.stevenson@sheffield.ac.uk)
  • Whyte, S. (sophie.whyte@sheffield.ac.uk)
  • Akehurst, R. (r.l.akehurst@sheffield.ac.uk)
Keywords: Bayesian methods, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, G-CSFs, febrile neutropenia, mixed treatment comparison, methodology
Dates:
  • 2009
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > Health Economics and Decision Science > HEDS Discussion Paper Series
Depositing User: ScHARR / HEDS (Sheffield)
Date Deposited: 15 Jun 2010 14:38
Last Modified: 05 Jun 2014 08:31
Status: Unpublished
Identification Number: HEDS Discussion Paper 09/08

Available Versions of this Item

Download

Filename: HEDS_DP_09-08.pdf

Share / Export

Statistics