White Rose University Consortium logo
University of Leeds logo University of Sheffield logo York University logo

Synthesising diverse evidence: the use of primary qualitative data analysis methods and logic models in public health reviews

Baxter, S., Killoran, A., Kelly, M. and Goyder, E. (2010) Synthesising diverse evidence: the use of primary qualitative data analysis methods and logic models in public health reviews. Public Health. ISSN 0033-3506 (In Press)


There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.

[img] Text

Download (232Kb)


Objectives: The nature of public health evidence presents challenges for conventional systematic review processes, with increasing recognition of the need to include a broader range of work including observational studies and qualitative research, yet with methods to combine diverse sources remaining underdeveloped. The objective of this paper is to report the application of a new approach for review of evidence in the public health sphere. The method enables a diverse range of evidence types to be synthesised in order to examine potential relationships between a public health environment and outcomes.

Study design: The study draws on previous work by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence on conceptual frameworks. It applied and further extended this work to the synthesis of evidence relating to one particular public health area, the enhancing of employee mental wellbeing in the workplace.

Methods: The approach utilised thematic analysis techniques from primary research together with conceptual modelling to explore potential relationships between factors and outcomes.

Results: The method enabled a logic framework to be built from a diverse document set that illustrates how elements and associations between elements may impact on the wellbeing of employees.

Conclusions: Whilst recognising potential criticisms of the approach, it is suggested that logic models can be a useful way of examining the complexity of relationships between factors and outcomes in public health, and of highlighting potential areas for interventions and further research. The use of techniques from primary qualitative research may also be helpful in synthesising diverse document types.

Item Type: Article
Copyright, Publisher and Additional Information: This is an author produced version of a paper accepted for publication in "Public Health". Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.
Keywords: systematic review, evidence synthesis, public health policy
Institution: The University of Sheffield
Academic Units: The University of Sheffield > Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health (Sheffield) > School of Health and Related Research (Sheffield) > Section of Public Health (Sheffield)
Depositing User: Mrs Vivienne Walker
Date Deposited: 11 Feb 2010 18:51
Last Modified: 08 Feb 2013 16:59
Status: In Press
Publisher: Elsevier
Refereed: Yes
URI: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/10357

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (repository staff only: login required)