Invited research article

Elevated uranium concentrations in Lake Baikal sediments: Burial and early diagenesis

  • a Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, CH-6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland
  • b Newcastle University, School of Civil Engineering and Geoscience, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom
  • c Empa, Materials Science and Technology, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
  • d Institute of the Earth's Crust, Siberian Branch of the RAS, 128 ul. Lermontova, Irkutsk 664033, Russia
  • e Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 133, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland

Abstract

The water column of Lake Baikal (Siberia) is pervasively oxic and O2 penetrates several cm into the sediment, followed by distinct layers of Fe/Mn oxide that undergo reductive-dissolution/oxidative-precipitation cycles. Uranium (U) contents of the oxic surface sediment layers were ~ 15 μg g− 1, which is unparalleled in oxygenated lakes. To understand the processes leading to this enrichment we investigated the geochemical composition of the particulate matter and pore water of four sediment cores from different locations in the lake and performed mass balance calculations based on sediment mass accumulation rates and published loads from major tributaries. The comparison of loads and export of U in Lake Baikal suggested that current estimates of loads are too low by a factor of about 3 compared to sediment mass accumulation rates. Peak loads during spring ice melt in tributaries that are difficult to monitor and quantify might be the main cause for the deviation. The high U concentrations in the lake sediments originated from the scavenging of U in the water column through association with settling organic particles and particulate Fe(III)- and, to a lesser extent, Mn(IV)-oxides. We outline the hypothesis that two distinct U phases, lithogenic and non-lithogenic U reach the lake sediment and that authigenic U is subsequently formed under reducing conditions within the sediment. In some cores we found that most U was remobilized during the degradation of organic matter, in particular within the top oxygenated layer of the sediment. Significant enrichments prevailed due to U adsorption to and/or co-precipitation with Fe-oxides. When Fe-oxides and, to a lesser extent, Mn-oxides were reductively dissolved, they released U to the pore water, leading to peak dissolved U concentrations in the anoxic sediment, which in turn, precipitated as authigenic U under predominantly sulphate-reducing conditions. The onset of the accumulation of authigenic U coincided with the formation of distinct Fe/Mn oxide layers above. We argue that the resilience of Fe-oxides (especially crystalline goethite and hematite), in association with phosphate, even within reducing (but non-sulfidic) sediments support the burial of substantial amounts of U.

Keywords

  • Uranium diagenesis;
  • Lake Baikal;
  • Trace elements;
  • Fe- and Mn-oxides;
  • Biogeochemical cycling in lacustrine surface sediments and pore water

1. Introduction

On Earth's surface environment, uranium (U), a radioactive metal from the actinide series, primarily occurs in two redox states with distinctly different physico-chemical characteristics. Under oxic conditions, such as in modern seawater, U is predominantly present as soluble and stable U(VI) carbonate complex (UO2(CO3)34 −) with a concentration of around 3.3 μg l− 1 (14 nM) and exhibits conservative behaviour with a high oceanic residence time of 0.3 to 0.6 million years (Ku et al., 1977 and Dunk et al., 2002). U concentrations in freshwater lakes are usually about one or two orders of magnitude lower than in the ocean (e.g. Falkner et al., 1997, Nagao et al., 2002, Chappaz et al., 2010 and Li et al., 2011), depending on the lithology of the lake's watershed (Palmer and Edmond, 1993, Windom et al., 2000, Dunk et al., 2002 and Andersen et al., 2016). The largest single sink for U in the ocean is by diffusion across the sediment-water interface into organic-rich, oxygen-depleted sediments (Anderson et al., 1989, Klinkhammer and Palmer, 1991, Calvert and Pedersen, 1993 and Morford and Emerson, 1999). Here it can be reduced to U(IV) at sedimentary redox conditions near those for the conversion of Fe(III) to Fe(II) (Ginder-Vogel et al., 2006), and precipitate either as uraninite (UO2), U3O7 or U3O8 (e.g. Klinkhammer and Palmer, 1991 and Crusius et al., 1996) or as a monomeric U(IV) species that readily associates with phosphate or carbonate functional groups (e.g. Bargar et al., 2013 and Morin et al., 2016). Thereby, microbially mediated reduction of aqueous U(VI) to sparingly soluble U(IV) is considered to be the most important process controlling the biogeochemical cycling of U in the subsurface (Williams et al., 2013 and Bargar et al., 2013). In Phanerozoic times, where significantly higher atmospheric and oceanic O2 concentrations allowed for a more pronounced role of oxygen in the U cycle, this may have been responsible for U contents in black shale of well above 100 μg g− 1 (Partin et al., 2013). Redox transitions influence the 238U/235U isotope ratio, which makes sedimentary U an important redox tracer due to the distinctly different geochemical behaviour of the reduced and oxidized species, and the long residence time in the ocean (Brennecka et al., 2011 and Andersen et al., 2016). A detailed understanding of the processes involved in the accumulation of U in the sediment and during early diagenesis is thus required.

In addition, uranium is associated with particulate matter in the water column, termed particulate non-lithogenic U (PNU; Anderson, 1982), either in the form of organic complexes (Knauss and Ku, 1983 and Hirose and Sugimura, 1991) or co-precipitated with Mn- and Fe-oxides (Duff et al., 2002, Dunk et al., 2002 and Cumberland et al., 2016). In well-oxygenated marine and lacustrine sediments, U concentrations typically remain in the range found within the Earth's crust, i.e. around 2.8 μg g− 1 (Taylor and McLennan, 1995). However, U concentrations of up to 250 μg g− 1 may be present in phosphatic rocks, and fine-grained sedimentary rocks typically contain more U than coarser-grained rocks due to the presence of clays and organic matter to which U adsorbs (e.g. Bird, 2012).

Oligotrophic (nutrient poor) and pervasively oxic Lake Baikal (Siberia, Russia) is the largest lake on Earth by volume and harbours about 20% of the world's available freshwater resources. Its watershed is dominated by granitoid rocks (Fagel et al., 2007), which, compared to other contemporary lacustrine environments, contribute to a comparatively elevated average U concentration of 420 ng l− 1 in the water column (Falkner et al., 1991 and Falkner et al., 1997). However, despite high O2 concentrations down to the lake bottom and into the top sediment layer, it has been shown that sedimentary U contents can reach > 20 μg g− 1 (Petrov et al., 1999, Zhmodik et al., 2003, Zhmodik et al., 2005, Chebykin et al., 2004, Chebykin et al., 2007 and Goldberg et al., 2005), i.e. about 5 times higher than the rocks of Lake Baikal's watershed (Jahn et al., 2009 and Litvinovsky et al., 2011). These U concentrations are also far higher than observed in other freshwater lake sediments where they typically range from 0.5 to 5 μg g− 1 (e.g. Markich, 2002). Mass balance calculations result in a U residence time of about 160 years in the water column, compared to 400 years for Lake Baikal's water mass (Falkner et al., 1997), suggesting that a significant portion of U is removed into, and permanently buried within the sediment. This is striking when considering that the residence time of U in the ocean exceeds the one for its water by about two magnitudes.

In this manuscript, we investigate and discuss the transport and settling of U in the sediment, and processes of remobilization and final sequestration during early sediment diagenesis leading to the high sediment content of U. The present study represents the third project on the diagenetic evolution and elemental composition of Lake Baikal sediments and pore water based on the same sediment cores (Och et al., 2012 and Och et al., 2014).

Note to users:
Accepted manuscripts are Articles in Press that have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by the Editorial Board of this publication. They have not yet been copy edited and/or formatted in the publication house style, and may not yet have the full ScienceDirect functionality, e.g., supplementary files may still need to be added, links to references may not resolve yet etc. The text could still change before final publication.

Although accepted manuscripts do not have all bibliographic details available yet, they can already be cited using the year of online publication and the DOI, as follows: author(s), article title, Publication (year), DOI. Please consult the journal's reference style for the exact appearance of these elements, abbreviation of journal names and use of punctuation.

When the final article is assigned to volumes/issues of the Publication, the Article in Press version will be removed and the final version will appear in the associated published volumes/issues of the Publication. The date the article was first made available online will be carried over.